30-day money-back guarantee on every paid tool and bundle — if it doesn't pull its weight, email support and we'll refund it.
Autonomously simulate Shipley Phase 7 color-team reviews (Pink ~30% / Red ~70% mock-SSEB / Gold ~95% exec sponsor)…
Autonomously simulate Shipley Phase 7 color-team reviews (Pink ~30% / Red ~70% mock-SSEB / Gold ~95% exec sponsor) against a pasted proposal draft + RFP Section L / Section M + win themes, then synthesize cross-color rewrite priorities and wrap the Red Team Consistency Checker to deliver four bundled audits — collapsing 130-200 reviewer-hours of color-team prep into a ~30-minute autonomous run.
Ships as one download · color-team-reviewer.zip · 10 files
A redacted example of what this tool produces — so you can judge the quality before you buy.
Redacted, illustrative example. Names, agencies, and figures are fictional placeholders.
Cover — Color Team Reviewer Report
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Solicitation | SOL-25-R-0042 (NOAA Environmental Data Modernization) |
| Offeror | Northwind Technical Services LLC |
| Draft stage | 70% |
| Agency archetype | Civilian Mission |
| Eval lens | Best-Value Tradeoff |
| Run | 6 phases COMPLETE · 1 retry (Phase 3 banned-word) · 0 incomplete |
HIGH-TRUST: This agent SIMULATES Pink / Red / Gold color-team reviewers using Shipley Phase 7 methodology and FAR 15.305(a) adjectival scheme. It does NOT replace human reviewers. Findings are agent-generated based on pasted draft + RFP; verify against source documents. Submission still requires human color teams, capture lead approval, and counsel review where applicable. No FOUO/CUI/classified content accepted in intake.
Theme Flow
Delivery · Download
Download the zip and add the agent definition — along with its bundled sub-agents and skills — to your Claude workspace. The README walks through wiring it together.
Runs on your existing Claude subscription — no extra setup.
HIGH-TRUST discipline. Where this tool produces pricing, compliance, or past-performance artifacts, FAR/DFARS guardrails and "FOR INTERNAL ESTIMATE USE — NOT A PROPOSAL PRICE" disclaimers are embedded in the output. It does not replace a qualified pricer, counsel, or color-team review.
Sign in to acquire
Runs on your Claude subscription · 30-day money-back guarantee
Compliance Traceability
Structural Completeness
Directive: rewrite §3 to carry cost-stability theme; add migration-uptime proof to Technical Approach; insert org chart. Recommend Tool #18 theme refresh before re-draft.
Adjectival ratings
| Section M Factor | Sub-factor | Rating | Anchor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Factor 1 — Technical Approach | Solution | Acceptable | Vol I §2, p.9–13 |
| Factor 1 — Technical Approach | Migration | Marginal | Vol I §2.3, p.12 |
| Factor 2 — Management | Staffing/Key Personnel | Good | Vol III §1, p.28 |
| Factor 3 — Past Performance | (confidence scale below) | — | Vol II |
DoD SSP tags
Past Performance confidence (separate scale): Satisfactory Confidence — 2 of 3 citations relevant in size; one citation off-NAICS (Vol II p.22).
Recommend-award verdict: Conditional — Significant Weakness on FedRAMP must be cured to reach competitive range.
| Check | Result | Anchor |
|---|---|---|
| Red comments incorporated | CONCERN | FedRAMP milestone still absent (p.11) |
| Brand consistency | PASS | logo/typography conform |
| Executive look-and-feel | CONCERN | Exec Summary buries discriminator (p.2 ¶3) |
| Submission readiness | FAIL | open Significant Weakness |
Verdict: FIX BEFORE SUBMIT.
| Rank | Finding | Severity | Owner | Effort | Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Add FedRAMP-High milestone dates | CRITICAL | Tech lead | 1 day | T-10 |
| 2 | Add migration methodology + uptime proof | HIGH | SME | 2 days | T-8 |
| 3 | Lead Exec Summary with discriminator | MEDIUM | Capture | 0.5 day | T-7 |
| 4 | Carry cost-stability theme into §3 | MEDIUM | Writer | 0.5 day | T-7 |
| 5 | Swap off-NAICS PP citation | LOW | PP lead | 0.5 day | T-6 |
Audit trail (excerpt): every adjectival rating links to draft page/paragraph above. Banned-words sweep: clean after Phase 3 retry ("robust" → "proven", Vol I p.10).
Illustrative sample, not a real engagement.