30-day money-back guarantee on every paid tool and bundle — if it doesn't pull its weight, email support and we'll refund it.
Autonomously assemble a Shipley-canonical VP-level capture brief from a pasted pursuit profile + agency intel +…
Autonomously assemble a Shipley-canonical VP-level capture brief from a pasted pursuit profile + agency intel + customer dossier + incumbent dossier + competitor paste-ins + PWin inputs. The agent runs 8 sub-agents in sequence — Setup, Agency Intel, Customer Intel (wraps the Customer Intimacy Tracker), Incumbent Intel (wraps the Incumbent Research Brief), Competitor Intel, PWin Scoring (wraps the PWin Scorecard), Win Plan, Deliverable Assembly (wraps the Capture Briefing Deck Generator) — and produces a 7-slide Markdown deck, 60-150-word speaker notes per slide, a supporting-data appendix, a standalone PWin scorecard, and a cover + audit trail. Collapses 1-2 working days of hand-built capture-brief assembly into a ~30-minute autonomous run.
Ships as one download · capture-brief-generator.zip · 12 files
A redacted example of what this tool produces — so you can judge the quality before you buy.
Redacted, illustrative example. Names, agencies, and figures are fictional placeholders.
Cover — Capture Brief Deck
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Pursuit | NOAA Environmental Data Modernization (EDM) recompete |
| Agency | Department of Commerce / NOAA / NESDIS |
| Capture phase | Active Capture |
| Capture lead | J. Okafor |
| Estimated value | $48M (5-yr ceiling) |
| Response deadline | 2026-09-15, 2:00 PM ET (verbatim) |
| Briefing date | 2026-06-12 (VP capture review) |
| Firm | Northwind Technical Services LLC |
HIGH-TRUST: This capture brief is an agent-generated synthesis based on pasted intel. It does NOT replace capture-lead judgment, customer calibration, or VP review. Verify every claim against source paste-ins. Capture-lead review required before VP presentation. No FOUO/CUI/classified content accepted in intake.
Run summary: 8 phases COMPLETE · 0 retries · 1 advisory (Slide 4 incumbent present — DEFENDED). Inputs present: 6/6 required, 5/7 recommended. No [INCOMPLETE] sections.
Delivery · Download
Download the zip and add the agent definition — along with its bundled sub-agents and skills — to your Claude workspace. The README walks through wiring it together.
Runs on your existing Claude subscription — no extra setup.
HIGH-TRUST discipline. Where this tool produces pricing, compliance, or past-performance artifacts, FAR/DFARS guardrails and "FOR INTERNAL ESTIMATE USE — NOT A PROPOSAL PRICE" disclaimers are embedded in the output. It does not replace a qualified pricer, counsel, or color-team review.
Sign in to acquire
Runs on your Claude subscription · 30-day money-back guarantee
Synthesizes a recompete lessons-learned memo, theme-refresh recommendation, and risk register from pasted prior…
Paste a pursuit stub, a customer-contact log, and a few capture context fields into three prompts.
Slide 3 — Customer (notes, ~120 words). Open with the recency band: we are YELLOW, not GREEN — last substantive touch was the 2026-03-18 PM call (Tool #30 dossier, touch log row 1). The three hot buttons drive every theme on Slide 7, so anchor them now. Hot button #1 (zero-downtime migration) is the customer's stated top fear from the Industry Day Q&A (paste line 7); we own past performance here and challengers do not (Slide 5). Hot button #2 (FedRAMP-High) is our exposure — do not oversell; signal the teaming path. Anticipated VP Q&A: "When did we last meet the CO?" → 2026-03-18, PM only, CO not since 2026-01. Recommend a calibration meeting pre-RFP (Decision on Slide 7). Backup: customer-touch log (Appendix B).
Slide 6 — PWin (notes, ~95 words). PWin is CONTESTED (40–60), not favorable — set expectations. The band is driven by three offsetting forces: YELLOW recency pulls down; incumbent DEFENDED (not ENTRENCHED) leaves an opening; the FedRAMP-High gap is the single largest drag. Walk the VP through the 7-dimension scorecard (Deliverable 4) — Customer Relationship and Solution Fit are our weakest dimensions. Anticipated Q&A: "What moves us to 60+?" → close FedRAMP gap via teaming + a GREEN re-calibration. Backup: scorecard dimension detail (Deliverable 4).
| Slide | Claim | Source 1 | Source 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | FY26 D307 growth | agency_intel_paste L11 | USAspending ref URL |
| 4 | Beacon option exercised | Tool #31 dossier §2 | FPDS row ref |
| 5 | No challenger holds migration PP | competitor_paste_ins L7 | Tool #30 dossier §4 |
| # | Deliverable | From phase |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7-Slide Capture Brief Deck | Phase 8 (Tool #33 wrap) |
| 2 | Speaker Notes | Phase 8 |
| 3 | Supporting Data Appendix | Phase 8 |
| 4 | PWin Scorecard (7-dimension) | Phase 6 (Tool #28 wrap) |
| 5 | Cover Page + Audit Trail | Phase 8 |
Audit trail (excerpt): Phase 1 parser 14:02:11Z → pursuit-summary.md · Phase 6 pwin-scoring 14:18:40Z → pwin-scorecard.md · Phase 8 assembly 14:29:55Z → final-deliverable/. Banned-words sweep: clean.
Illustrative sample, not a real engagement.